| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
141. Sticky:[Odyssey 1.1] Tech 1 Industrials, Round 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Taleden wrote: Zaxix wrote: This is a rather pointless discussion. What does it matter what is labeled what? Also, the Quafe Itty has a special bay and it's not an ORE product. That's also a novelty ship and not really relevant to this re...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.06.27 19:42:00
|
142. Sticky:[Odyssey 1.1] Tech 1 Industrials, Round 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ellahan Vhektor wrote: if gall an min get "special ships " so should amarr and caldari anything else would be unbalanced and as far as i can remember this was about ship balancing and this would be an unbalancing i really wanted a badger mark 3...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.06.27 18:51:00
|
143. Sticky:[Odyssey 1.1] Tech 1 Industrials, Round 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Shepard Wong Ogeko wrote: CCP Rise wrote: edit: Also I want to acknowledge all the ideas around converting the special bay haulers to ORE, or any other similar solution. I completely understand where you're coming from but this simply isn't...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.06.27 18:46:00
|
144. Sticky:[Odyssey 1.1] Tech 1 Industrials, Round 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Salpad wrote: CCP Rise wrote: One of the most recent posts mentions increasing the bonus per level from skills for the special bay haulers, and I was thinking the same thing. I'm going to increase the skill bonus per level for all the specia...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.06.27 18:40:00
|
145. Sticky:[Odyssey 1.1] Tech 1 Industrials, Round 2 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Rise wrote: Today's update: We are going to go ahead and bump the unpacked volume on the Hoarder significantly (up to 400000) to avoid any major issues with compression. This gives it the same packed volume to cargo ratio that the Iteron V...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.06.27 18:33:00
|
146. AFK Cloaking - Sponser a Newb - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kijo Rikki wrote: Endeavour Starfleet wrote: Kijo Rikki wrote: I think you underestimate how cheap cloaking ships are and how easy it would be for an alliance to simply send a cheap heron with a t1 cloak in and let it get found and send ...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.06.20 15:05:00
|
147. AFK Cloaking - Sponser a Newb - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kijo Rikki wrote: I think you underestimate how cheap cloaking ships are and how easy it would be for an alliance to simply send a cheap heron with a t1 cloak in and let it get found and send in a replacement. Every once in a while, send in so...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.06.20 14:51:00
|
148. AFK Cloaking - Sponser a Newb - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: My hope is that nullbears will whine enough local will get a nerf or cloaking ships will disappear from local when cloaked. At the very least CCP would actually take a side on these issues. So I am glad to see this top...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.06.20 14:47:00
|
149. AFK Cloaking - Sponser a Newb - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kijo Rikki wrote: Endeavour Starfleet wrote: Let it be? I and many others have made suggestions in detail on how CCP can bring balance to cloaking without harming active players. The ideas are there and CCP never comments other than to say i...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.06.20 14:43:00
|
150. AFK Cloaking - Sponser a Newb - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Let it be? I and many others have made suggestions in detail on how CCP can bring balance to cloaking without harming active players. The ideas are there and CCP never comments other than to say it is not an exploit. My guess is that Cloaking code...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.06.20 13:40:00
|
151. AFK Cloaking - Sponser a Newb - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I want to thank you for doing this. No seriously. You are spending your own isk and alts to help prove just how unbalanced the ability to go away from the client while cloaking is. CCP has never said anything positive about doing that other than...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.06.20 12:16:00
|
152. Federation expresses dismay at Republic handling of Broteau - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Typical Republic apologists. Attempting yet again to divert attention away from the real issues. The fact that the Republic considers its allies sovereignty to be optional and the continued insults towards our laws and justice system.
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.06.18 13:17:00
|
153. Federation expresses dismay at Republic handling of Broteau - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Vikarion wrote: Niko medes wrote: We are a culture that isn't of vengeance or revenge. Millions of dead Caldari over the last three hundred years might take exception to that. Oh, and you don't even need a good reason - the Gallente start...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.06.18 03:00:00
|
154. 'Local' is a problem? Why is that? (further study on AFK cloaking subject) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Issue is you have a place where you don't show up in local. Your problem has already been fixed. Not going into wormhole space to experience your no local PVP leads me to believe you want free big ganks in my opinion. Also I don't want combat pro...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.06.18 01:56:00
|
155. Federation expresses dismay at Republic handling of Broteau - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
I am glad I am not the only one that was rechecking the fluid routers when I actually heard "unfortunate misunderstanding" coming from that Republic apologist. If the battle was SOMEHOW a misunderstanding the Republic would not have allowed a ver...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.06.18 01:45:00
|
156. Holders Handbook: Revised Edition - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Come for them? Seems the Republic is too busy killing their allies to bother themselves in actually fighting their so called enemies. Or freeing their brothers. How can you actually give such false hope to those people?
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.06.18 01:35:00
|
157. 'Local' is a problem? Why is that? (further study on AFK cloaking subject) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
gaijiin pok wrote: Azami Nevinyrall wrote: If you cloak, you should be removed from local. Just like WH space. wouldn't this be nice, a stealth ship could actually be .... stealthy Pok Tell me how many free ganks would it take to s...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.06.18 01:24:00
|
158. Broteau found guilty and executed by Sebiestor Tribe - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Assuming the Republic does not try any further hostile action as a result of the alliance being dissolved. That would be preferable to war indeed.
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.06.18 01:08:00
|
159. Gerne Broteau transferred into Republic custody - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
I wish to agree with you that dissolving our alliance with the Republic would be the best course of action at this time and is preferable to war. Tho war must remain on the table so the Republic does not get any further ideas that they can invade ...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.06.18 01:04:00
|
160. Twitch.tv ingame streaming button coming - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ranger 1 wrote: I don't really think this makes much difference... perhaps a few seconds are saved by not having to tell someone else what is happening in the target system, they can see it for themselves. Since your spy will be on voice coms a...
- by Endeavour Starfleet - at 2013.06.17 20:13:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |